Hysteresis Model of Dietary Inflammation

Inflammation_Diet_Hysteresis_Model_1

The longer you spend on a “high inflammation” diet, the more long-term “damage” you do

This post is a follow-on from my previous post regarding exercise and the Hysteresis Model of Inflammation vs. Strength. The concept is almost identical in nature except that this time we’re talking purely in terms of diet and not exercise. 

The above graph is a modified version of the diet, inflammation & longevity curves that I first introduced in this post. For clarity, I have simply removed the longevity curve to leave only the inflammation curve. All the rest is the same.

Hysteresis – The Long-Term damage that can’t be undone

Let’s consider someone on a “high-carb” diet at the far left of the graph, “point 1.” on the lower blue curve. Note that this “point 1.” is the same for all other diets along the bottom blue curve, at the intersection with the dashed (black) diet line. The longer they remain on this or any other “high inflammation” diet, the greater the cumulative oxidative stress, and hence also the greater the permanent damage incurred to the organism becomes. Accordingly, their long-term chronic inflammation also starts to increase vertically until they arrive at “Point 2.” on the upper blue curve. Again, this “Point 2.”corresponds to any other diet where the solid black line intersects the upper blue curve. At this point, the individual decides to move to a Lower Inflammation diet, let’s say “Meat & Water” but it could be any other diet to the right of the current diet, along the x-axis.

Once they are at the “meat & water” diet, they are at “Point 3.” on the upper blue inflammation curve. Note that despite moving to a much lower inflammation diet, they are unable to return to the ultimate state of dietary low inflammation at “Point 4.” on the lower blue curve. Why? Because of the “Age / Time” gap that opened up between points 1. & 2. on their high(er) inflammation diet. This is known as hysteresis & is a function of both your age and the time spent between points 1. & 2. – the greater the gap here, the greater the “residual” inflammation between points 3. & 4. also becomes. This may manifest itself in terms of metabolic diseases such as T2D, autoimmune diseases such as osteoarthritis or any other form of long-term, chronic “silent” inflammation. In this case, the only possible way (excluding strength training) that you may be able to return to Point 4. is through the use of a “longevity drug” such as Metformin or Berberine. As with the Inflammation/ Strength curves discussed above, a full recovery, even using Metformin, is unlikely except for the very young. Hence, for max longevity, it is in the individual’s own interest to choose a low inflammation diet as soon as possible and stick to it!

 

Advertisements

One thought on “Hysteresis Model of Dietary Inflammation

  1. Dear Nick

    I m finishing my writings. At end of the week we go to Switzerland to meet my sister. I have then more time to think our project and i will contact ypu

    Antti

    Ps interesting idea I mean yours below > LIHF (Low Inflammation, High Fat) Living kirjoitti 18.4.2017 kello 15.09: > >

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s